Jump to section
Baseus Blade
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
Wins 2 specs
Anker 737
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
Wins 4 specs
Quick Verdict
Baseus Blade is lighter with 4 ports — Anker 737 packs more capacity and peaks at 140W.
- Best for Ultralight Travel Baseus Blade
- Best Capacity & Peak Output Anker 737
- Best USB-A Compatibility Baseus Blade
- Best for High-Power Laptops Anker 737
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Full Spec Comparison
Technical term? Tap, hover over, or focus a dotted underline for a plain-English explanation. Browse the glossary.
| Spec | Baseus Blade | Anker 737 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 20,000 mAh | 24,000 mAh |
| Wh Rating | 74 Wh | 88.8 Wh |
| Max Output | 100W | 140W |
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A Ports | 2 (30W each) | 1 |
| Max Input | 65W | 65W |
| Weight | 1.0 lb (450 g) | 1.72 lbs (780 g) |
| Display | LED indicator | Smart LED display |
| Airline Carry-On | Yes (74 Wh) | Yes (88.8 Wh) |
USB-A Ports
2
Baseus Blade
1
Anker 737
Baseus Blade: 100% more
Max Output
100
W
Baseus Blade
140
W
Anker 737
Anker 737: 40% more
Capacity
20,000
mAh
Baseus Blade
24,000
mAh
Anker 737
Anker 737: 20% more
Want the wider view? See all the power banks we have compared in one spec table, or the power banks statistics (medians, ranges, feature adoption).
Analysis
The Baseus Blade and Anker 737 represent a genuine trade-off in portable power: one prioritizes compact size and multi-port flexibility, the other prioritizes raw capacity and peak charging speed. Both are airline-legal, both carry enough charge for a full laptop charge-and-a-half on a travel day, and both support 100W single-device laptop output — but the differences between them are significant enough to matter.
Weight and footprint are where the Baseus Blade earns its audience. At 1.0 lb (450 g), it is 330 g lighter than the Anker 737 at 1.72 lbs (780 g). That gap is not negligible over a long day in a shoulder bag or on a hiking approach to a remote worksite. The Blade's flat, slim shape also stacks cleanly against a laptop in a bag without creating awkward bulk. For travelers already carrying a laptop, charger, and accessories, reducing the power bank's contribution to pack weight by a third is a meaningful benefit.
The Anker 737 counters with capacity. Its 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) holds roughly 20% more energy than the Blade's 20,000 mAh (74 Wh). On a longer travel day — a red-eye flight, a multi-day camping trip, or a full conference day away from outlets — that additional 14 Wh translates to roughly one extra phone charge or a meaningful extension of a laptop charge session. The 88.8 Wh rating also sits comfortably within the 100 Wh airline carry-on threshold, while the Blade at 74 Wh is even more conservatively within limits.
Peak output is the Anker 737's second structural advantage. At 140W, the Anker 737 covers the maximum USB-C input of virtually every laptop currently on the market, including MacBook Pro 16" (96W–140W rated), high-performance Windows laptops, and gaming-class machines. The Baseus Blade's 100W ceiling charges these same machines — just not at their maximum supported speed. For most users, that speed difference is minor and unnoticeable in practice. For users who specifically bought a 140W-capable charger to maximize their laptop's charge rate, matching that with a 140W power bank is the logical pairing.
Port configuration tips toward the Baseus Blade for users with older accessories. Two USB-A ports (30W each) allow two USB-A devices to charge simultaneously — a game controller, an older phone, a headset — without adapters. The Anker 737 provides one USB-A port, which handles one USB-A device at a time. Both banks share identical 65W max input, meaning neither charges faster from a wall than the other. Choose the Baseus Blade if weight, size, and USB-A flexibility are the priority; choose the Anker 737 if you need the highest capacity, fastest peak output, and can accept the added weight.
Who Should Buy Which
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
At 1.0 lb (450 g), the Baseus Blade is 330 g lighter than the Anker 737 and significantly slimmer. For backpack travelers counting ounces or anyone who finds the Anker 737 too bulky, the Blade delivers 100W laptop charging in a much smaller envelope.
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
The Anker 737 holds 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) versus the Blade's 20,000 mAh (74 Wh) — about 20% more total charge. Its 140W peak output also covers the fastest USB-C laptop chargers on the market, while the Blade caps at 100W.
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
Two USB-A ports at 30W each let the Baseus Blade charge two USB-A accessories simultaneously without adapters. The Anker 737 provides a single USB-A port — adequate for one device but limiting for users carrying USB-A cables for multiple peripherals.
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
Laptops rated above 100W input — including many MacBook Pro 16" and higher-end gaming laptops — charge at full speed on the Anker 737's 140W output. The Baseus Blade's 100W ceiling still charges these machines, but slightly slower than their maximum rated input.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the Baseus Blade and Anker 737?
The Baseus Blade is the lighter, more compact option at 450g with 100W max output, while the Anker 737 weighs 780g but holds more capacity at 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) against the Blade’s 20,000 mAh (74 Wh) and peaks higher at 140W. The Blade also carries two 30W USB-A ports versus the 737’s single port.
Which is better for ultralight travel, the Baseus Blade or Anker 737?
The Baseus Blade is better for ultralight travel, weighing 1.0 lb (450g) against the Anker 737’s 1.72 lbs (780g), a 330g difference that adds up over a long day in a bag. Its flat, slim shape also stacks cleanly against a laptop without adding bulk, while still delivering 100W laptop charging despite the smaller footprint.
Does the Baseus Blade have two USB-A ports?
Yes, the Baseus Blade includes two USB-A ports rated at 30W each, letting two USB-A accessories charge simultaneously without adapters. The Anker 737 provides only one USB-A port, which handles one device at a time. For users with multiple older peripherals, the Blade’s extra port is the more practical setup.
Is the Anker 737 worth it over the Baseus Blade?
The Anker 737 is worth it if you need the highest capacity and fastest peak output, since its 24,000 mAh and 140W ceiling cover laptops rated above 100W input, including many MacBook Pro 16-inch and gaming laptops. The Baseus Blade’s 100W ceiling still charges those machines, just not at their maximum rated speed.
View on Amazon
Ready to decide?
Confirm current pricing and availability on Amazon — both links open the product page in a new tab.
Aged 18–24? You qualify for Prime for Young Adults — free fast shipping on either pick.
Everyone else: start a Prime trial for free fast shipping.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.