Anker 737 vs Anker Prime 220W
Anker 737 holds 4,000 mAh more — Anker Prime 220W charges faster and recharges faster too.
By Chris Weller · Last updated: June 2026 · Affiliate disclosure
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
View on Amazon →As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
View on Amazon →As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Full Spec Comparison
| Spec | Anker 737 | Anker Prime 220W |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | ✓ 24,000 mAh | 20,100 mAh |
| Wh Rating | ✓ 88.8 Wh | 72.36 Wh |
| Max Total Output | 140W | ✓ 220W |
| Max Single USB-C Output | 60W | ✓ 140W |
| USB-A Output | Yes | ✓ 22.5W |
| Max Input | 65W | ✓ 100W |
| Weight | 1.72 lbs (780 g) | ✓ 1.12 lbs (510 g) |
| Display | LED indicator | ✓ Smart display + app |
| Airline Carry-On | Yes (88.8 Wh) | Yes (72.36 Wh) |
Analysis
The Anker 737 and Anker Prime 220W are both flagship Anker power banks aimed at laptop travelers, and both clear the 100 Wh airline carry-on threshold. The difference between them is sharper than it looks: the 737 is a capacity-first bank, and the Prime 220W is a performance-first bank. The right choice depends on which constraint you hit first — running out of charge or charging too slowly.
Capacity is the 737's sole but important advantage. Its 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) holds roughly 20% more energy than the Prime's 20,100 mAh (72.36 Wh). In practical terms that is approximately one additional full smartphone charge, or an extra 10–15% of a laptop battery. For a solo traveler on a two-day trip who recharges the bank each night, the gap is nearly invisible. For someone on a longer stretch without reliable outlets — a camping trip, a full conference day hopping between sessions, a long international flight — the 737's extra energy reserve extends the window before you run dry.
Output speed is where the Prime 220W makes a decisive argument. Each USB-C port on the Prime delivers up to 140W independently, and the combined ceiling is 220W — meaning a 140W MacBook Pro and a second device can both charge at full speed simultaneously. The 737 peaks at 140W total, with approximately 60W available per USB-C port in shared use. For a MacBook Air (30–45W) or a standard laptop, the 737 is perfectly adequate. For a MacBook Pro 16" or a high-performance Windows laptop with a 96W to 140W charger, the Prime's higher per-port ceiling delivers a noticeably faster single-device charge.
The input speed difference is easy to overlook but practically important. The Prime accepts up to 100W via USB-C, recharging itself in roughly 45 minutes from a 100W wall charger. The 737's 65W input takes significantly longer to recover the same capacity. This matters most for travelers who plug in during a layover, a meeting break, or a hotel check-in and then immediately unplug — the Prime catches up faster in short charging windows.
Weight and display round out the comparison. The Prime at 1.12 lbs (510 g) is 270 g lighter than the 737 at 1.72 lbs (780 g) — a meaningful difference for minimalist packers. Its smart display and Bluetooth app show real-time output wattage, remaining percentage, and port-level distribution; the 737's LED indicator gives a rough quartile reading. If you have a high-power laptop and want fast charging and faster self-recharging in a lighter package, the Prime 220W is the pick. If raw capacity and the extra headroom it provides over multiple days is the priority, the 737 holds more charge.
Who Should Buy Which
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
At 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) the Anker 737 holds roughly 20% more energy than the Prime's 20,100 mAh (72.36 Wh). For multi-day travel or anyone charging multiple devices between outlets, the extra headroom is a real operational advantage.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
The Anker Prime's 220W total output and 140W per USB-C port means a high-power MacBook Pro can charge at its full rated speed. The 737's 140W ceiling and 60W per USB-C port is fast for most laptops but noticeably slower for devices rated above 60W single-port input.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
The Prime's 100W input recharges itself significantly faster than the 737's 65W input cap. On a 30–45 minute layover with a 100W wall charger, the Prime recovers more usable charge than the 737 in the same window — a meaningful edge for frequent travelers.
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
The 737's 88.8 Wh gives it a larger total energy reserve for extended travel days. If you cannot recharge the bank daily and need it to carry multiple devices through a full conference day or overnight flight, the 737's extra 16 Wh is the safety margin that matters.
View on Amazon
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
View on Amazon →As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
View on Amazon →As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.