Jump to section
Anker 737
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
Wins 2 specs
Anker Prime 220W
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
Wins 6 specs
Quick Verdict
Anker 737 holds 4,000 mAh more — Anker Prime 220W charges faster and recharges faster too.
- Best Total Capacity Anker 737
- Best Peak Output Anker Prime 220W
- Best Recharge Speed Anker Prime 220W
- Best for Long Trips Anker 737
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Full Spec Comparison
Technical term? Tap, hover over, or focus a dotted underline for a plain-English explanation. Browse the glossary.
| Spec | Anker 737 | Anker Prime 220W |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 24,000 mAh | 20,100 mAh |
| Wh Rating | 88.8 Wh | 72.36 Wh |
| Max Total Output | 140W | 220W |
| Max Single USB-C Output | 60W | 140W |
| USB-A Output | Yes | 22.5W |
| Max Input | 65W | 100W |
| Weight | 1.72 lbs (780 g) | 1.12 lbs (510 g) |
| Display | LED indicator | Smart display + app |
| Airline Carry-On | Yes (88.8 Wh) | Yes (72.36 Wh) |
Max Single USB-C Output
60
W
Anker 737
140
W
Anker Prime 220W
Anker Prime 220W: 133% more
Max Total Output
140
W
Anker 737
220
W
Anker Prime 220W
Anker Prime 220W: 57% more
Max Input
65
W
Anker 737
100
W
Anker Prime 220W
Anker Prime 220W: 54% more
Want the wider view? See all the power banks we have compared in one spec table, or the power banks statistics (medians, ranges, feature adoption).
Analysis
The Anker 737 and Anker Prime 220W are both flagship travel batteries, and both clear the 100 Wh airline carry-on line without issue. But they’re built around different bets. The 737 bets on capacity. The Prime bets on speed. Which one you should pick really depends on which problem you run into first: running out of charge, or waiting too long for it to fill back up.
Capacity is the 737’s clearest advantage, and it isn’t small. At 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh), it holds about 20% more energy than the Prime’s 20,100 mAh (72.36 Wh). That’s roughly one extra full phone charge, or another 10 to 15% of a laptop battery. For a two-day trip where you recharge the bank every night, that gap barely registers. For a longer stretch without a reliable outlet, camping, a packed conference day, an overnight international flight, the 737’s extra reserve is what buys you the extra hours.
Output speed is where the Prime pulls ahead, and it’s not close. Each USB-C port delivers up to 140W on its own, with a combined ceiling of 220W, so a 140W MacBook Pro and a second device can both charge at full tilt at the same time. The 737 tops out at 140W total, split down to about 60W per port when both are in use. That’s plenty for a MacBook Air or a typical ultrabook. It’s not enough to unlock the full charging speed of a MacBook Pro 16-inch or a high-performance Windows laptop built for a 96W to 140W charger. For those machines, the Prime’s higher per-port ceiling wins the charge, full stop.
Recharging tells a similar story. The Prime accepts up to 100W over USB-C and can refill itself in about 45 minutes from a 100W wall charger. The 737’s 65W input takes noticeably longer to recover the same capacity. This matters most in the gaps between things, a layover, a break between meetings, a quick hotel check-in, where you plug in and unplug again almost right away. In those short windows, the Prime simply catches up faster.
Weight and display close out the comparison. At 1.12 lbs (510 g), the Prime is 270 g lighter than the 737’s 1.72 lbs (780 g), which shows up fast in a bag you’re already stuffing with a laptop and cables. Its smart display and Bluetooth app show real-time wattage, remaining percentage, and which port is drawing what. The 737 just gives you a rough LED quartile reading, better than nothing, not much more. If you own a power-hungry laptop and want fast charging plus a faster self-recharge in a lighter shell, get the Prime. If raw capacity and the extra runway it gives you over several days matters more, the 737 still holds more total charge.
Who Should Buy Which
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
At 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh) the Anker 737 holds roughly 20% more energy than the Prime's 20,100 mAh (72.36 Wh). For multi-day travel or anyone charging multiple devices between outlets, the extra headroom is a real operational advantage.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
The Anker Prime's 220W total output and 140W per USB-C port means a high-power MacBook Pro can charge at its full rated speed. The 737's 140W ceiling and 60W per USB-C port is fast for most laptops but noticeably slower for devices rated above 60W single-port input.
Anker Prime Power Bank (20K, 220W)
The Prime's 100W input recharges itself significantly faster than the 737's 65W input cap. On a 30–45 minute layover with a 100W wall charger, the Prime recovers more usable charge than the 737 in the same window — a meaningful edge for frequent travelers.
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)
The 737's 88.8 Wh gives it a larger total energy reserve for extended travel days. If you cannot recharge the bank daily and need it to carry multiple devices through a full conference day or overnight flight, the 737's extra 16 Wh is the safety margin that matters.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the Anker 737 and Anker Prime 220W?
The Anker 737 holds more total energy at 24,000 mAh (88.8 Wh), while the Anker Prime tops out at 20,100 mAh (72.36 Wh) but delivers far more power, 220W total against the 737’s 140W. The Prime also recharges faster with 100W input versus the 737’s 65W and weighs 510g against the 737’s 780g.
Which is better for charging a MacBook Pro, the Anker 737 or Anker Prime?
The Anker Prime is better for charging a MacBook Pro, since each USB-C port delivers up to 140W, enough for a high-power laptop to reach its full rated charging speed. The Anker 737 caps at 60W per USB-C port once both ports are in use, fast for most laptops but short of a MacBook Pro’s peak speed.
Does the Anker Prime 220W have a display?
Yes, the Anker Prime includes a smart display paired with a Bluetooth app that shows real-time wattage, remaining percentage, and which port is drawing power. The Anker 737 only has a basic LED indicator giving a rough quartile reading of remaining charge. For precise monitoring, the Prime’s display is the clear upgrade.
Which recharges faster, the Anker 737 or Anker Prime?
The Anker Prime recharges faster, accepting up to 100W over USB-C and refilling in about 45 minutes from a 100W wall charger. The Anker 737’s 65W input takes noticeably longer to recover the same capacity. On a short layover or a quick break between meetings, the Prime catches up to a full charge first.
View on Amazon
Ready to decide?
Confirm current pricing and availability on Amazon — both links open the product page in a new tab.
Aged 18–24? You qualify for Prime for Young Adults — free fast shipping on either pick.
Everyone else: start a Prime trial for free fast shipping.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.