Jump to section
Anker 747
Anker 747 Power Bank (PowerCore 26K)
Wins 2 specs
Baseus Blade
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
Wins 6 specs
Quick Verdict
Anker 747 carries more charge at 25,600 mAh — Baseus Blade outputs 100W and weighs 148 g less.
- Best Capacity Anker 747
- Best for Single-Port 100W Charging Baseus Blade
- Best for USB-A Accessories Baseus Blade
- Best for Airline Travel Baseus Blade
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Full Spec Comparison
Technical term? Tap, hover over, or focus a dotted underline for a plain-English explanation. Browse the glossary.
| Spec | Anker 747 | Baseus Blade |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 25,600 mAh | 20,000 mAh |
| Wh Rating | 94.72 Wh | 74 Wh |
| Max Single-Port Output | 87W (laptop mode) | 100W (USB-C) |
| USB-C 1 Output | 45W | 100W |
| USB-C 2 Output | 18W | 100W |
| USB-A Ports | 2 (7.5W each) | 2 (30W each) |
| Max Input | 65W | 65W |
| Weight | 1.32 lbs (598 g) | 1.0 lb (450 g) |
| Airline Carry-On | Yes (94.72 Wh — near limit) | Yes (74 Wh — comfortable) |
USB-C 2 Output
18
W
Anker 747
100
W
Baseus Blade
Baseus Blade: 456% more
USB-C 1 Output
45
W
Anker 747
100
W
Baseus Blade
Baseus Blade: 122% more
Capacity
25,600
mAh
Anker 747
20,000
mAh
Baseus Blade
Anker 747: 28% more
Want the wider view? See all the power banks we have compared in one spec table, or the power banks statistics (medians, ranges, feature adoption).
Analysis
The Anker 747 PowerCore 26K and Baseus Blade 100W represent two different philosophies for portable laptop power. The Anker 747 prioritizes total stored energy — 25,600 mAh gives it a substantial capacity advantage. The Baseus Blade prioritizes per-port output speed and a lighter form factor, with each USB-C port capable of 100W. The right choice depends almost entirely on whether you need more charge or faster charge.
Capacity is the Anker 747's core strength. At 25,600 mAh, it holds roughly 28% more energy than the Baseus Blade's 20,000 mAh. On a practical level, this translates to approximately one additional full phone charge or a meaningfully longer laptop charge session before the bank runs dry. For users who spend multiple days away from outlets — camping trips, long conference runs, international travel with unreliable socket access — the Anker 747's extra headroom is a real operational difference, not just a spec on paper.
Output speed tells a different story. The Baseus Blade's USB-C ports each deliver up to 100W independently, which covers the full rated input of nearly all USB-C laptops sold today, including MacBook Pro models and high-performance Windows machines. The Anker 747's USB-C 1 port delivers 45W in standard mode and reaches 87W in a combined laptop mode that draws from both USB-C ports simultaneously. For most MacBooks (which charge at 67W or 96W), the 747's 87W peak is adequate. For users with laptops that benefit from 96W to 100W input, the Baseus Blade charges faster from the same starting battery level.
The USB-A port comparison favors the Baseus Blade significantly. Both banks ship with two USB-A ports, but the Baseus delivers 30W per port versus the Anker 747's 7.5W per port. The 7.5W output on the Anker is essentially limited to Apple Watch charging and basic trickle-charging for older accessories. Any device that supports Quick Charge or fast USB-A charging will receive dramatically faster speeds from the Baseus Blade. For users with USB-A peripherals that support faster charging, the difference between 7.5W and 30W is the difference between a 3-hour charge and a 45-minute top-up.
The airline carry-on situation is worth flagging. The Baseus Blade at 74 Wh clears the 100 Wh threshold by a comfortable margin that virtually no airline will question. The Anker 747's confirmed 94.72 Wh sits 5 Wh under the 100 Wh airline carry-on limit — legal on all major carriers, but close enough that a strict agent will flag it for manual review. If you travel through airports with rigorous enforcement, carrying the Baseus Blade's 74 Wh unit removes that friction entirely. The Baseus Blade is the cleaner choice for frequent flyers who want to avoid that friction. Weight follows the same pattern: the Baseus Blade at 1.0 lb (450 g) is meaningfully lighter than the Anker 747's 1.32 lbs (598 g), a 148 g difference that adds up over a long travel day.
Who Should Buy Which
Anker 747 Power Bank (PowerCore 26K)
At 25,600 mAh the Anker 747 holds roughly 28% more energy than the Baseus Blade's 20,000 mAh. For multi-day trips or heavy users who need more total charge before finding an outlet, the 747's extra headroom is the deciding factor.
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
Each USB-C port on the Baseus Blade delivers up to 100W — enough to charge a MacBook Pro at full rated speed. The Anker 747's primary USB-C tops out at 45W standard and reaches 87W only in a combined laptop mode, making it slower for high-draw laptops.
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
Both banks include two USB-A ports, but the Baseus Blade's deliver 30W each versus the Anker 747's 7.5W per port. Faster USB-A output matters for older phones and accessories that support Quick Charge — the Anker 747's 7.5W USB-A is limited to basic trickle charging.
Baseus Blade 100W 20000mAh Laptop Power Bank
The Baseus Blade's 74 Wh rating clears the 100 Wh airline carry-on limit with 26 Wh to spare. The Anker 747's confirmed 94.72 Wh is 5 Wh under the limit — legal, but close enough that a strict airline agent will notice. For frequent flyers who want zero friction at security, the Baseus Blade is the cleaner choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the Anker 747 and Baseus Blade?
The Anker 747 holds more capacity at 25,600 mAh (94.72 Wh) versus the Baseus Blade’s 20,000 mAh (74 Wh), roughly 28% more energy. The Blade counters with faster per-port output, 100W on each USB-C port against the Anker’s 45W standard mode, plus 30W USB-A ports versus the Anker’s 7.5W, and weighs 148g less at 450g.
Which is better for airline travel, the Anker 747 or Baseus Blade?
The Baseus Blade is better for airline travel, since its 74 Wh rating clears the 100 Wh carry-on limit with 26 Wh to spare. The Anker 747’s confirmed 94.72 Wh is legal but only 5 Wh under the limit, close enough that a strict agent may flag it for review. Frequent flyers avoid that friction with the Blade.
Does the Anker 747 charge at 100W?
No, the Anker 747’s primary USB-C port delivers 45W in standard mode and reaches 87W only in a combined laptop mode drawing from both USB-C ports at once. The Baseus Blade delivers a full 100W independently from each USB-C port, enough to charge a MacBook Pro at its full rated speed. The Blade is the one that actually hits 100W.
Which has faster USB-A charging, the Anker 747 or Baseus Blade?
The Baseus Blade has faster USB-A charging, delivering 30W per port against the Anker 747’s 7.5W per port. The Anker’s 7.5W output is essentially limited to Apple Watch charging and basic trickle charging for older accessories. Any device that supports Quick Charge will charge dramatically faster from the Blade’s USB-A ports.
View on Amazon
Ready to decide?
Confirm current pricing and availability on Amazon — both links open the product page in a new tab.
Aged 18–24? You qualify for Prime for Young Adults — free fast shipping on either pick.
Everyone else: start a Prime trial for free fast shipping.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.